> [...] assume that this price is somehow driven by supply/demand driven market
I didn't say that. Intelligent actors tend to avoid any real competition. The price is what enough clients are willing to pay to make the whole scheme profitable. There doesn't need to be any fairness for this to happen.
Going back to the original point, the price is set in a non competitive environment with the chance of the introduction of new competition is basically nil.
This is monopolistic, anti-competitive and wrong, and the less wealthy sections of the population suffer the most (as per usual).
I didn't say that. Intelligent actors tend to avoid any real competition. The price is what enough clients are willing to pay to make the whole scheme profitable. There doesn't need to be any fairness for this to happen.