Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why does it have to be either/or? A systematic approach guarantees that you have seen each capital city at least once.


Why are the capitals so important? Maybe I want to travel to Kyoto or Makati instead of Tokyo or Manila. I can see the value in knowing the countries and a little about them, but capitals aren't the entirety of a country, and knowing about them won't tell you much about the country as a whole.

I can learn about the capitals if I ever plan to go there.


Capitals are the most important part of a country (by definition). What little information could you learn about a country before knowing its capital?


Is Washington DC more important than NYC or any city in Silicon Valley? I'm not convinced that capitals are the most important city.

You can talk about the culture, economy, and history of a country without ever talking about the capital. Capitals are usually (not always) where the government sits, but that's only a small part of what you can learn about a country.


It surely has a lot of influence on economy, history (culture is a different thing in a country-continent like the USA, but most countries are the size of a state, not the Union). Is * important to understand the state of *?

Texas City^H^H Austin of Texas

Los Angeles^H^H Sacramento of California

Anchorage^H^H Juneau of Alaska

--

Edited to fix the initial bad example.

--

Screw it, USA states have their capitals assigned to the weirdest cities instead of the largest ones. No wonder that you don't understand why capitals are important to normal countries.


We definitely have an odd way of assigning importance to subdivisions of land. I live in an area where one of the "cities" is a mansion rented out for events with a few businesses and homes built to support it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl,_Georgia




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: