Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Great points. I recommend actually reading the paper behind the blog post (http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/170528/msr-tr-2012-79.pdf). I guarantee it'll blow your mind how well the system works. It's much more compete than you imagined.


I second the call of bullshit. Though I've only skimmed the paper, I don't see any concrete performance numbers. I only see this:

"The group has written sev- eral million lines of code, including: core libraries (includ- ing collections with polymorphism over element permis- sions and data-parallel operations when safe), a webserver, a high level optimizing compiler, and an MPEG decoder. These and other applications written in the source language are performance-competitive with established implementa- tions on standard benchmarks; we mention this not because our language design is focused on performance, but merely to point out that heavy use of reference immutability, includ- ing removing mutable static/global state, has not come at the cost of performance in the experience of the Microsoft team."


You forgot to read all the text you just copied:

    "we mention this not because our language design is focused on performance, but merely to point out that heavy use of reference immutability, ...has not come at the cost of performance in the experience of the Microsoft team."
Stop trolling




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: