Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Mercurial was there, was better and more complete.

Too sad it didnt win the VCS wars.



When I tried both at that time hg was just really slow so I just adopted git for all my personal projects because it was fast and a lot better than cvs. I imagine others were the same.


I went with bzr mainly because it had an easy way to plugin "revision" into my documents in a way I could understand and monotonously increment.

hg was slow though I don't know how bzr compared as I was using it pretty light-weight.


Mercurial and Git started around the same time. Linus worried BitMover could threaten Mercurial developers because Mercurial and BitKeeper were more similar.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: