Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That’s why I think the sweet spot is to write up plans with Claude and then execute them with Codex
 help



Weird. It used to be the opposite. My own experience is that Claude’s behind-the-scenes support is a differentiator for supporting office work. It handles documents, spreadsheets and such much better than anyone else (presumably with server side scripts). Codex feels a bit smarter, but it inserts a lot of checkpoints to keep from running too long. Claude will run a plan to the end, but the token limits have become so small in the last couple months that the $20 pla basically only buys one significant task per day. The iOS app is what makes me keep the subscription.

Correct, this is the way. A year or two ago lots of people were saying to do the opposite, but at least now and probably also even then, this is better. Claude is a more sensible and holistic designer, planner, debater, and idea generator. Codex is better at actually correctly implementing any large codebase change in a single pass.

And it fits well with the $20 plans for each since Codex seems to provide about 7-8x more usage than Claude.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: