Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is something that always gets lost in these conversations.

Whenever you do the real world calculation for what an electric cars CO2 profile looks like it turns out to be the same as a gasoline car unless your country is majority nuclear.

 help



> Whenever you do the real world calculation for what an electric cars CO2 profile looks like it turns out to be the same as a gasoline car unless your country is majority nuclear.

Not at all true: https://www.carboncounter.com/

US-specific but you can even pick a state and it will use the generation mix of that state


You charge your car at night.

At night the sun doesn't shine.

The mix is mostly coal or if you're lucky mostly gas.

This is the type of bullshit I mean by doing real world calculations.


Maybe today, but basically everywhere south of Canada solar is so high ROI that it's just a question of time before sunlight hours have electricity so much cheaper that the primary daytime parking locations become the favored (slow-)charging spots.

For you to prefer charging there your employer only has to charge you less during the day than your utility charges during the night, so the day/night rate arbitrage can easily pay for the metering hardware and installation (at the next opportunity to install without having to dig the parking lot up just for the chargers), with the rest being profit to incentivize the managers to install/offer this.


The wind blows, water flows, nuclear glows. Further, demand's at lows.

In my state (idaho) at night the power mixture is primarily renewable/clean because of this.


I charge during the day, from my rooftop PV panels. Over a year we are net negative on grid consumption.

This means you don’t take your car to work, which isn’t typical

I produced over 400kWh last week, in February.

This is wrong, and by a long way.

Or majority renewable.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: