Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
freejazz
11 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted after Suprem...
> human review or testing
Review and testing do not confer a copyright the work reviewed or tested
help
circuit10
11 days ago
[–]
I guess I was thinking more when it involves rewriting large parts of it because they don't work
reply
freejazz
11 days ago
|
parent
[–]
That would be authorship, no?
reply
circuit10
11 days ago
|
root
|
parent
[–]
It sounds like they might be under the impression that having any AI-generated output in the code even if parts are human authored would invalidate the copyright, which isn’t true
reply
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
Review and testing do not confer a copyright the work reviewed or tested