Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Does it even need to be explicitly stated? Closed linux userlands.


What does “userland” mean in this context? Closed source linux distributions? Closed source apps? What?

The gpl is generally considered to stop at the process boundary. I don’t really understand what you could do with a bsd licensed coreutils you couldn’t do with a gpled coreutils. You could make closed source Linux software which called coreutils in a child process. But by most readings of the gpl, you can do that today.

I suppose a company could fork coreutils and make it closed source, keeping their special extra command line options for themselves. But … I guess I just don’t see the value in that. You can already do that with FreeBSD. Apple does exactly that today. And the sky hasn’t fallen. If anything, it would be a relief to many if Apple’s coreutils equivalents were more compatible with gnu coreutils, because then scripts would be more freely portable between Linux and macOS.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: