Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As a flicker-sensitive person: the sad part of it is that to do this properly you need to have your LEDs on a proper inverter, so for most scenarios getting rid of the flicker means "get expensive light fixtures _and_ rewire their supply _and_ you can't use your existing AC mains anymore, nor can you use switches". The PWM is a cheap way to do dimming given the AC input of the grid. And it will be especially prevalent when you do want LEDs but you don't want to "do anything special" to make them work well


Let's take a bulb, and instead of one led we have 10 less powerful leds in one package.

Now you can turn off leds one at a time, have 1/10th dimming, and no pwm.

The same could be done with LCD backlighting or edge lighting on displays. Additional complexity, to be sure, but no power loss.

OLED is, well.. oled. Not sure what to do there.


Except that perceived illumination is log, not linear ;)


All the better for low light situations then.


And effectively useless for dimming in the upper half of the intensity range.

You could of course turn on/off leds in an exponential fashion, but that would result in an impractically large light to be able to dim properly, and with increased cost (much cheaper to assemble fewer more powerful leds than many smaller ones).


I'd just wire some in quads, and some in pairs to save on complexity.

Then maintain a 1/10 lux range with the combinations. Note I'm not doing the math, just showing how simple it is to work around. It's all just napkin.

The cost isn't a biggie, if it's for a target market and shares the rest of the assembly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: