You have to actually utilize the legal system. Other suggest attaching licenses to they published content/data preventing AI training, but attaching the license alone does nothing. You have to actually drag someone to court once in a while for it to work.
It's the same complaint about the GDPR, if it works why are site still doing X/Y/Z... Well because all people do is complain online, you need to report violations and be prepared to take legal action.
> legal complaints only work against people in your country and those it works with.
Well yes. Process Service tends to be quite different from country to country, and if you don't know how it works there, you probably won't be able to make vague "legal complaints" and have them taken seriously.
If you really want to make a legal complaint in Russia, I would suggest you look into what is called a Process Service Specialist who has specific experience with Arbitrazh.
I get what your saying, and I do question the value of suing someone in Russia, or China, but did you actually get a lawyer file an actual real lawsuit in Russia? Again, Russia, probably no really going to work.
There's absolutely no reason why you couldn't drag OpenAI to court... you'd need a ton of money, but you could and if you win, then the rest of the AI companies are going to get very busy adjusting their behaviour.
Laws.
This one is called copyright.
> Gonna be interesting to see how that "public but in my control" movement continues to evolve
Berne convention is almost 150 years old now...