Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why do you say that? Imagine you wrote a language that looked procedural but was actually relational underneath? We could get rid of so much glue and use unification when it made sense and ignore it otherwise. That’s a great idea


Sounds similar to Haskell "do" notation where it can look procedural, but backed by FP principles and tools.

(Something something monads are sequentialness)




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: