Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd rather eat sand than read an AI-generated article. If you don't care enough to write it, I don't care enough to read it.


I don't like formatting in bullet points and listicles much, but the contents are pretty good, they cover many papers in a lightweight way, you can get a decent overview in 10 minutes for what would take hours to research.


> the contents are pretty good, they cover many papers in a lightweight way, you can get a decent overview in 10 minutes for what would take hours to research.

Exactly, I'm still surprised it works so well.

Also, which formatting do you prefer? I explicitly prompted it to write everything in bullet points because I find it more digestible


I prefer prose because it has better flow. Usually I have to specify this manually or the LLMs will happily generate bulletpoints and listicles.

More recently I prefer chain-of-thought prose to the final answer. I can trigger it with a prompt even on non-reasoning models and it's usually easier to follow.


How long would it take you to generate your own equally good summary of these papers using Claude? Maybe 30 seconds?


Would be curious to compare the results!


Hi, OP here; this article helped me a lot to understand better KV caches, which is ultimately why I co-wrote it with AI + read it several times before posting




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: