Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You lead with a command to be honest and then immediately speculate on private unknowable motivations and then attribute, without evidence, his decision to a strategy you can't describe.

What is this? Someone said something nice, and you need to "restore balance"



They said something naive, not just "nice". It's good to correct the naivete.

For example, as we speak, Zuck is lobbying congress to ban Tiktok. Putting aside whether you think it should be banned, this is clearly a cynical strategy with pure self interest in mind. He's trying to monopolize.

Whatever Zuck's strategy with open source is, it's just a strategy. Much like AMD is pursuing that strategy. They're corporations and they don't care about you or me.


What was said that was naive?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: