I think it is fair to say that this approach only works in some domains. We won't be using it where giving the 'wrong' answer upsets the people with the money. But if you listen to the channel 9 interview put up by 6ren he clearly outlines a number of scenarios that are appropriate.
<not-snarky>It isn't clear what quantum computing has to do with this discussion.</not-snarky>
"...It isn't clear what quantum computing has to do with this discussion..."
My entire point was that the way we describe future tech emphasizes the differences and exotic nature of the concepts instead of how it's all going to eventually work together anyway. Quantum computing was my second example.
I agree with your sentiment that it isn't clear how this will fit into software development in general. Fair enough about the quantum comment. Also, my comments sounds snarkier that it was intented, so apologies for that :) (what a polite bunch we all are)
<not-snarky>It isn't clear what quantum computing has to do with this discussion.</not-snarky>
Edit: Mitigate snarkiness of final comment.