Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd want to see a fine of 20% of revenue if around 5% to 10% of its revenues came from illegal activities. If that's the case, maybe the company should be killed. The fine must be a multiple of the gains or there's no benefit to following the law.

> big or small

That's exactly the point. Flat fines (not saying $1.3B is a flat fine, in this case) only kill small companies and act as a small "break the law fee" for big companies.

> And we are talking revenue, not profit.

Right, you cannot fine based on profit, because profit is a gameable number (Hollywood Accounting).

I'm not actually saying $1.3B is the wrong number: it's possible that's 3x to 5x of the revenue they gained from brazenly and wantonly breaking the laws of the country in which they operated. I haven't done enough research to say. What I was responding to was this:

> I do not think there is any amount of money that could be fined that HN commentators would not call a slap on the wrist.

Most fines for most offenses against most companies are slaps on the wrist, because they are less than the gain. This is why.

> I can’t tell if you’re trolling

This is a bad-faith attempt to dismiss an argument without considering it.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: