> data transformers that can transform raw data without coding at all
How do you know this is 100% reliable, per upthread discussion?
We've already had this problem with Excel in various sciences, which while deterministic has all sorts of surprising behaviors. Genes had to be renamed in order to stop Excel from mangling them: https://www.progress.org.uk/human-genes-renamed-as-microsoft...
AI promises "easier than Excel, but not deterministic". So more people are going to use it to get less reliable results.
Weird argument. Excel is one of the most popular and profitable programs of all time. If your argument is that LLMs are like Excel, the logical conclusion would be that they would be wildly successful.
There are two contexts in my experience where it's been important to get the numbers exactly right:
1. Cherrypicking sports statistics for newly set records and the like (NB: this is not lucrative)
2. Financial transaction processing
In most other contexts, especially analytics and reporting, nobody cares and nobody is going to check your math, because the consumers are just trying to put a veneer of numeracy on their instincts.
How do you know this is 100% reliable, per upthread discussion?
We've already had this problem with Excel in various sciences, which while deterministic has all sorts of surprising behaviors. Genes had to be renamed in order to stop Excel from mangling them: https://www.progress.org.uk/human-genes-renamed-as-microsoft...
AI promises "easier than Excel, but not deterministic". So more people are going to use it to get less reliable results.