> over a hundred lines of console each to print just the function name
At what point is it better to just rename everything to use the sha256 of the "real" name? It's obviously only for machine use anyways, so it's not like one more layer of indirection would hurt.
It was handy to see the outer couple of layers of template expansion, though, so I could know at least which library it came from. I’d be very interested in some way to adjust the displayed format to be different from the “real” type name (which is of course different from the machine-readable mangled name). It might be better to put that functionality in the debugging tool.
At what point is it better to just rename everything to use the sha256 of the "real" name? It's obviously only for machine use anyways, so it's not like one more layer of indirection would hurt.