but why is he being down voted? All he did was to point out that this article has been published before.
Maybe there are some interesting comments in the "dupe" thread? (in this case no, but you get the point)
I'm still new to HN and I find the up/down vote behaviour rather peculiar from time to time. This is such a time.
If there was discussion on the original submission it would have been useful)
Providing a bit more context in your post would have probably helped.
but why is he being down voted? All he did was to point out that this article has been published before.
Maybe there are some interesting comments in the "dupe" thread? (in this case no, but you get the point)
I'm still new to HN and I find the up/down vote behaviour rather peculiar from time to time. This is such a time.