Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We do, at least to my mind. It's called Mercurial. It's great, extremely close to git, but is much easier to use IMO. It's really a damn shame that git won - primarily, I think, due to the cachet of its author.


Either way, is Git actually that hard to use? You can learn about 10 commands and develop any software just with those. I have no illusions about it's gnarly aspects but also just don't find it particularly difficult. Contrast a programming language that might have footguns in just printing strings.


Git is a pain to provide support for if you’re an internal tools team, lots of users with incorrect mental models


Close. It won because of Github. Git was gaining over SVN slowly but it was Github that really propelled it into widespread use.


The way I remember it git one for two reasons: 1. hg was (maybe still is?) much slower 2. “No technology can ever be too arcane or complicated for the black t-shirt crowd” (fake Linus’s words not mine)





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: