Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I would be interested to see if someone did the same thing with Obama.

My guess is that since Google is in bed with the Obama administration, we would never see anything like this.

The majority of people are supporting it because they hate rick Santorum and don't want him to become president.

It also makes me question the validity of the opposition. Rather than trying to win with logic and reason, many resort to mud-slinging, rumors, and false information. Tactics I despise.



It has been done already: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/24/michelle-obama-phot...

Your guess is correct.


I agree that such tactics are not helpful for a rational, adult conversation. However, if someone is spreading hate-speech about gays on religious grounds, he is far beyond the reach of logic and rationality.


I recommend reading the whole article — it explains why you are wrong, and how there is no "bedding" involved in this situation. The explanation is about halfway through the article (ctrl-f "google bomb").


Google isn't causing this. That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that if there were anything negative related to Obama like this, Google would remove it.

My hunch is correct (taken from the above poster): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/24/michelle-obama-phot...

This is an example of state-controlled media (IE: Google is in Bed with the Obama administration). How is this in any way okay?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: