This comment exhibits the exact behaviour it purports to criticise: generalisation.
The submission is about Binance, but the comment tries to broaden the subject to "crypto". It succeeds.
Some might say introducing a tangent, here about a theory of utility of something, acts to deflect attention away from the facts, in this case an operation that has been under investgation by US authorities for years and is now under more public scrutiny, and for (arguably) good reason.
I am not disgreeing with the comment. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. I am simply observing it has introduced a tangent. The thread got hijacked. The subject of the submission is Binance, specifically its accounting practices.
The submission is about Binance, but the comment tries to broaden the subject to "crypto". It succeeds.
Some might say introducing a tangent, here about a theory of utility of something, acts to deflect attention away from the facts, in this case an operation that has been under investgation by US authorities for years and is now under more public scrutiny, and for (arguably) good reason.
I am not disgreeing with the comment. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. I am simply observing it has introduced a tangent. The thread got hijacked. The subject of the submission is Binance, specifically its accounting practices.