Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This does appear to be the angle. Which is nice from a "developer building a prototype" perspective, but if you're actually delivering to clients, something like Webflow means that the client can make changes themselves and not worry about patching future security vulnerabilities.


Security vulnerabilities are particularly present in executable code; but if it generates a static site, it’s much less prone to vulnerabilities.

I’ve seen Webflow or HubSpot site builders, but I’m reluctant to pay $20-to-200, depending on the website.


Definitely- I assumed more than static sites as it specifically mentioned Remix, which is like Next.JS- intended to be used as a back and front end.

But I do now see you can create static sites with this too.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: