Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
sph
on Nov 13, 2022
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
AT&T Syntax versus Intel Syntax (2001)
Be that as it may, the AT&T indirect memory reference `section:disp(base, index,scale)` is an abomination unto God.
At least the Intel one makes actual mathematical sense: `section:[base + index*scale + disp]`
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
At least the Intel one makes actual mathematical sense: `section:[base + index*scale + disp]`