This link gets shared around every now and then, and my response is always the same: there is some useful insight, but there's also information that's so outdated it provides no value, outright misinformation, and self-contradiction. Some of the technical points are fair, and should be and are being addressed. But the commentary is often laughably wrong. The document seems more focused on advancing an agenda than a good-faith effort at improving security in FreeBSD.
I thought it had been updated? Either way I agree with what you wrote. I think author also had some problems with FreeBSD's code of conduct; make of that what you will.
It used to have a section at the bottom that described changes made in FreeBSD (negating some of the points made above), but it has since been deleted.
Previous submissions (that have comments):