> Again, you don't want to hear answers, and the hostile tone further confirms it.
Ah yes:
Me: provides a clear answer, links to an extended answer to one of the claims (about tickets and NFTs), asks for examples of actual useful applications of NFTs
birracerveza: starts the conversation with an ad hominem attack ("you don't want to hear answers"), repeats the same attack several more times, claims it is I who is hostile.
You are attacking with actual ad-hominems ("crypto peddler" is an ad-homimem, pointing out that you're refusing my answer is not), discarding everything I write based on "You don't need blockchain to do that" and then, when I point out you do not want to hear answers because your entire point is "You don't need blockchain to do that" you claim I'm the one "attacking" you, distorting the conversation to fit your agenda. Read the conversation and see who is attacking who. You're providing no useful input, you just want to scream at "crypto peddlers".
Of course
> Again, you don't want to hear answers, and the hostile tone further confirms it.
Ah yes:
Me: provides a clear answer, links to an extended answer to one of the claims (about tickets and NFTs), asks for examples of actual useful applications of NFTs
birracerveza: starts the conversation with an ad hominem attack ("you don't want to hear answers"), repeats the same attack several more times, claims it is I who is hostile.
Yup. Crypto peddlers in all their glory