I had never heard of this so found the article interesting but it seems like this place is clearly real so I am a little confused why the article is written the way it is.
Conspiracy clickbait given there’s actually recent pictures of the place. If the guy really was dedicated to figuring it out, could’ve hopped the gate, flew a drone, or just kayaked down.
The constant tone of “how could anyone believe that!” on totally believable stuff. Like why would the family donate money to the fire department (according to the pics, it’s heavily wooded) if they didn’t want them to protect their property.
Again the whole point is moot because you can see the pictures
I mean I think you can safely discard any notion that this article is written to be convincing when it makes no mention of satellite imagery one way or another.
