xmlstarlet is really nothing like jq, as a language. But yes, I use it because it is the best commandline xml processor I'd found. That's the only similarity to jq.
This is a bash one-liner! But TBF it really is a 'jq for xml'. I think it would be horrible for some things, but you could also do a lot of useful things painlessly.
Thank you for the comments. I've only recently discovered both tools, and literally used them once each. Of the two `xq` was easier for my particular work case (parsing a Magento config) but I keep both tools in my virtual toolbox.
If you have any other suggestions for parsing XML for exploratory purposes I'm very happy to hear them.
Thanks! Not actually a reccommendation, but I have used xsltproc (command line xslt), but it is horrible to use because xslt syntax is horrible (though xslt's concepts are pretty cool). One thing is it enables you to use XPath in all its glory.
Just installed xq. It's nice just seeing the pretty-printed json output, so thanks for the pointer. Probably better than xmlstarlet for my usage, which just queries and outputs text, not xml. hmmm, that's probably true for most commandline uses...
Is this the yq? https://kislyuk.github.io/yq/ It does contain an 'xq', as a literal wrapper for jq, piping output into it after transcoding XML to JSON using xmltodict https://github.com/martinblech/xmltodict (which explodes xml into separate JSON data structures).
This is a bash one-liner! But TBF it really is a 'jq for xml'. I think it would be horrible for some things, but you could also do a lot of useful things painlessly.