Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That was what made Lala so brilliant:

1) No subscription requirement. I'm not convinced that the average consumer spends $120 a year on music and wants that expense every month of paying for a MOG, Spotify or Rdio.

2) Extremely low per-song price made "impulse" buys easy.

3) Matching your library to their catalog without uploading.

4) A really nice web interface. Extremely good for 2 years ago. Amazon's is so-so, and I haven't tried Google's yet (looks good from screenshots). I doubt Apple will do one at all.



Very well said. But don't forget the full-length free preview of any song. I loved that "once and only once" feature.


I forgot all about that, yes that was a killer feature as well. That turned out to be the killer feature for Google's music search as well, and made it infinitely less valuable when Lala went away.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: