Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Economics is not something that can be tested easily on a large scale, so most of it becomes about trying to explain why things happened in retrospect.


Which can be restated as "Economic theories, on average, have little predictive power."

I'm glad I took econ classes, but it is not a very practical discipline.

And, yes, I think it's a stretch to call it a science when you can't do meaningful experiments.

I object to calling geology a science for the same reason.


I would probably agree, but saying something is difficult to test is not the same as saying that many theories don't seem to be true in practice.


Valid point.


You can say exactly the same thing about archaeology or geology or cosmology...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: