Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
rntz
on Dec 13, 2010
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
What if we tested laws before passing them?
You have your Prolog backwards.
foo(X) :- bar(X).
means that foo(X) is true if bar(X) is true, not the other way around. So your code would indicate that anything that's not a law is unconstitutional, and anything unconstitutional prohibits free exercise of religion (for example).
jgfoot
on Dec 13, 2010
[–]
oh! that explains why my Prolog hacking has been so unsuccessful. Thanks very much.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
