"corporation does not get a vote and neither does your vote get removed"

Exactly. It's pretty hard to argue being a corporation is somehow special, our courts correctly recognized that. I agree with your second paragraph completely.

Without corporate personhood, how do I sue a company for a harm it did to me? I can't prove the CEO, the human being who does administrative jobs, did the harm, and I certainly can't prove any other employee did, either, so who do I sue? Do I try to sue everyone from the board on down to the janitor? That kinda screws the janitor, to be named in a suit for something the low-level employees had no control over.

So how does it work?

You sue the company, not a person. Why would you assume companies can't be sued if they're not 'people?'

> Why would you assume companies can't be sued if they're not 'people?'

Because that's literally why corporate personhood exists: To be able to sue companies.

And I find it very illuminating that the only response demonstrates ignorance.

If the law says you can sue a company, then you can sue a company. There is no reason why a company has to be a person for this to occur.

In fact, I'm looking at the federal rules of US civil procedure right now, and they say nothing about 'personhood' being required to take action. They say "A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court" and it has a specific section called "SERVING A CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, OR ASSOCIATION" and it goes on and on about officers, general agents, representing attorneys, and other such appointed persons who will become involved in such a case.

So perhaps you should actually take a look at the law before you accuse others of ignorance.