> The project or repo's star count _was_ a first filter in the past, and we must keep in mind it no longer is.
Id suggest the first question to ask is "if the project is an AI project or not?" If it is, dont pay attention to the stars - if it's not, use the stars as a first filter. That's the way I analyse projects on Github now.
Nice! I was thinking about doing something like this but for cycling, however one of the biggest PIA about building products for sports is all the gating of data.
Does the NHL really provide an API for all games? That's nice...
The request definitely comes from the leagues' broadcast partners, right? They would want as many eyeballs concentrated in as few places as possible so they can sell ads for more.
They might not use the word, but the behavior they describe is evil:
"
This isn’t a matter of open-source etiquette, the MIT license has exactly one major requirement: include the copyright notice. Ollama didn’t.
The community noticed. GitHub issue #3185 was opened in early 2024 requesting license compliance. It went over 400 days without a response from maintainers. When issue #3697 was opened in April 2024 specifically requesting llama.cpp acknowledgment, community PR #3700 followed within hours. Ollama’s co-founder Michael Chiang eventually added a single line to the bottom of the README: “llama.cpp project founded by Georgi Gerganov.”
"
I’ve got a decent amount of people on the newsletter so trying to figure out how to best deliver indie games via that channel and in the end get more people playing these awesome games people develop :)
Also, submit it to https://hnarcade.com :)
reply