One thing I am missing to be able to move out of Claude Code, is the auto mode (and the soft_deny and hard_deny settings that can be tuned), with it's classifier checking the output.
It's the killer feature from me personally, often when wanting to troubleshoot for example things like Kubernetes workloads. LLMs are now really good at it, but we doesn't want them to like delete a pod.
Other harnesses like Codex have often on static rules, like the allow/deny of claude code, that can filter out based on regex. It's quite good already, but sometimes the model can find a way to write something that wasn't anticipated, or in a convoluted way.
After, I guess it's something that can be added in an open-source harness like Pi, and add like this new Jev model or something else equivalent
Often politics, lack of vision, people being shuffled around, etc (e.g the stakeholder that decided of the acquisition just got moved to an another department, this kind of things)
Maybe a crash is what we need to reset the balance. We are spending a lot of money building shovels, but not enough to invest on the company that will use what will be mined.
If the money could flow back to the real economy instead of the AI economy, it might be healthier for the whole system.
It's crazy indeed. When working in company as DevSecOps, if we try to attempt pentest on prod without warning anyone, we will just get fired on the spot. AI Labs seems to have a free pass...
One thing that might be taken into account is the delay between ordering a plane, and the delivery (can take up to 10 years), so 1.5 years and 139$ million is worth investing into, to keep revenue flowing earlier.
Would a direct pitch to some HFT shops works better than kickstarter, to raise money for FPGA related work? They are ones of the main users in term of production usage. This project might be useful for them, for training / PoC / quick prototyping.
Quite interesting the response from MITRE: `It is not considered a security vulnerability because of how it requires a local attacker with privileges present to make it so`.
I didn't knew about that rationale. I thought Defense-in-Depth was all about that, preventing security incidents even when an attacker start to get some elevated privileges on the system?
If not, that's quite a practical reference for future CyberSec meetings.
For this one, I loved playing Dofus when I was younger. It was (hopefully still) a quite popular french turn-by-turn 2D MMORPG.
The main goal is PoE or PvP, but actually I ended up fully playing for the economy.
You can get a job with its own leveling system, like a farmer, cutting crops, collaborate with a baker who will make you a cut so that he can get baker xp, and then sell the bread in an auction based local marketplace for player to buy and heal.
You can as well just arbitrage: buy something cheaper in one town, and sell it in an another where it was more popular.
I ended up with a tone of paper notes, just calculating the margin of different product, e.g jewellery, so that I can buy the materials, calculating the risk of loss during the building process, partner with someone for some materials, and then finding where to sell the end product
You might really enjoy Caravaneer 2 (the original was a flash game, RIP, but the sequel requires no knowledge of the original). Whole game is traveling around a wasteland, hauling trade goods between towns that have their own industries, and thus varying supply and demand for various goods.
reply