Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | webo's commentslogin

routing+account numbers are not that sensitive. that's been API for how we transact money since pre-historic times. plaid gets access to your online account with access personal data, security details, documents, transactions, statements, write-access etc.


Hijacking this comment to complain about fintech apps / saas providers requiring Plaid - please stop.

For example, Coinbase requires logging in with Plaid to... setup auto-pay for their credit card statements. No way to just provide account/routing numbers the good ole way.

There's lots of issues with Plaid but one big one is that banks (e.g big ones like BofA) can lock your account due to suspicious login with Plaid.

https://x.com/kanateven/status/1973793740331368841


Airbnb requested Plaid access to my entire Chase account and all transactional data to "verify my credit card" a few years ago, and wouldn't budge until I tried Apple Pay, where they apparently weren't able to figure out the underlying issuer and accordingly left me alone.

Needless to say that it was my last stay with Airbnb.


What will you do once all of the accommodation providers start doing this AND they figure out how to see through Apple Pay?


They're a YC company so every other YC company is going to use them, that's how YC companies operate.


This isn't at all how YC companies operate (source: I did YC), but also... Plaid is not YC.


Seems kinda weird then that they're listed in workatastartup.com: https://www.workatastartup.com/jobs/15283


Plaid is not a YC company. You can just google it to confirm.


Yet they are listed on the site that claims to only have YC companies. Very odd.


I don’t know why they are on there, but YC startups list their batch and year in parentheses on job posts, e.g. (W25). Example: https://www.workatastartup.com/jobs/88812

The Plaid listing you linked doesn’t have a batch by their name.


Still kinda weird that a non-YC company gets to have job listings on a site for only YC companies.


I don't know; I'm not involved. Just noticed the UI affordance.


Clearly you are not involved lol. The suggestion seems to be that YC is involved in some way; perhaps untraditional.


Funnily enough, Flock has stopped doing that.


Plaid has an option to let the client/provider accept plain account + routing numbers, a lot of apps for whatever purpose don't use it.


Plaid is not a YC company


They have job listings in workatastartup.com but maybe any startup can now be listed even if they're not a YC company: https://www.workatastartup.com/jobs/15283


I was curious if LLMs are good for this problem. ChatGPT-5.1-Thinking one-shotted a correct Python script without any library use (https://pastecode.io/s/jg6ggxpm).

Claude Opus failed to solve after trying for a while.


project euler problems are likely in the RL corpora


First of all, don't do this. No one cares. Secondly obviously every Euler solution is going to appear in the training data many times over. It's no surprise at all that an LLM can regurgitate data that was given to it.


I do care. I appreciate /u/webo's comment. If you're a hater, don't generalize to others. There are still people out there embracing new technologies and change, and with an intact engineering spirit driven by sheer curiosity.


I thought it was interesting, and I wouldn't be surprised if Euler solutions weren't in the training data, especially for the later problems like this one.


I appreciate you trying it! So at least I care.

I used to do these in college to procrastinate my homework. I always had the most difficulty with the problems that required data structures I wasn't exposed to previously and ended up making really complicated solutions that were inefficient as hell, but fun nonetheless.

I might give them a try with golang now that it's my preferred language. I used to do them in python as that was our intro language.


Perhaps you meant to reply to webo? I'm not sure what you think I might have been trying.


In my experience, isolated (repeated) data storage paradigm is even more common at large organizations. They share data via services, ETLs, event buses, etc.


On one hand, the market seems to react to these appropriately. On another hand, the market has a short-term memory and prices go back up.

It's unfortunate Auth0 was acquired by them. Have used it from the beginning and it used to be a great product before the Okta acq. Now it's just constant sales emails, expensive pricing, not much new feature launches, most features are very enterprise focused, bunch of bugs, frequent outages.


Stock 41% up in the last 12 months is not appropriate.. it basically signals, "buy at a huge discount after each incident, we'll keep it rising regardless".

At this point, one could speculate they are not worth almost at all given they fail to deliver on their primary value proposition. They are not and have not been profitable either, only getting worse: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/OKTA/financials?p=OKTA


This sort of business doesn’t have to immediately realize a profit they just have to expand their base of customer and dig their claws deeper into their customers core infrastructure. Once they do that they can exploit their customers for years before they’l be able to escape. Since they are frequently going to be competing in “lowest bidder wins” competitions they’re be foolhardy to try and make a profit up front honestly, counter-intuitively it would be lighting money on fire. This is also a product with pretty substantial benefits from scale, as Okta gets bigger more things integrate with them so they’re easy to integrate with so they get bigger…

I’m just wondering who in the industry is still stupid enough to stick their neck out for Okta? Why are they getting new customers? Why not go with the other devil you know your cloud provider to offer mostly the same services? What is Okta offering when they seem relatively incompetent compared to the competition that often offers their products for cheaper up front?


They're still growing revenue, at least as of July.


SupplyPike | Senior Software Engineer | Hybrid (Rogers, Arkansas)

Looking for an experienced software engineer to join our strong engineering team. Series B B2B growing startup with about ~100 employees & 30 engineers. We build software products to help some of the largest brands with their supply chains.

Apply: https://careers.supplypike.com/en/postings/a1aac20d-0490-4de...


Somebody described Slack vs Teams this way:

- Slack is so easy and fun to use that we use it for things we shouldn't be (fun channels, fun integrations). It creates too much noise and hard to extract signal. It ends up being distracting past 100+ people company.

- Teams is so bad that people try not to use it. It forces you to use it minimally because everything is terrible. It actually ends up being more productive than Slack.


Here's my problem with Teams: the search is terrible. I know I had a conversation with someone (but maybe I don't remember if it was just them, them and a few others, or a meeting chat, or a team chat), I know what it was about, I know a few words from it...and I can't reliably search for it. Useless.


And that fucking card UI absolute abomination.

And now they have just flipped the interface so you scroll up for new and not down. With no warning and no notification so for the first day no one could find any current conversations.

And the terrible "Teams documents" so we can lock away documents behind a specific chat. If anyone should be having layoffs, it is their UX folks.


I can't believe how bad the search is. Every time I need to find something we talked about days or weeks ago, it's torture.


Teams are much cheaper though - $4 vs $7.25 per user per month for a roughly equivalent plan.


It's cheaper yah, but each time I lose ten minutes it costs me more than that.

That was part of the pitch at work - "oh, over 3 years our total savings is $200k" or something. Great, but if each dev loses 10 minutes a month, or is frustrated and less efficient for an hour, that costs us 5x that.


Honestly the (last I used) inability to go back to a conversation months ago via search is a much higher cost.


Unsure if it still is, but if you had a MS office contract it was free, which describes a lot of the defense industry.


Teams creates knowledge siloes which is worse than Slack. Every company I have used ends up with people creating various "Teams" and channels under them, then everyone just creates group chats all the time because it's easier.


US doesn’t give out a permanent residency based on how long you lived in the country. There’s only a few common paths to immigration: employment sponsored (2-20 years), marriage based (1-3 years), other family based (2-20 years), investor based (1-3 years). Student or tourist years don’t matter.



lol. I've read someone saying that if chatgpt can do computer interview questions… maybe the questions are trash. Seems we aren't the only ones with the issue.


+Snapchat. Twitter also is experimenting (experimented?) with endless video scrolling.


Twitter needs to figure out how to render video in general, before trying to scrap with the big boys.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: