Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kin's commentslogin

Same. The product page strategically has zero images of a hand holding it folded. https://www.apple.com/iphone-duo/

After looking one up... https://www.engadget.com/img/gallery/apple-iphone-duo-announ... It looks awkward to hold.


Curious how much replacement heads will cost if they're going to stick an RFID in every single one. Surely there's a cheaper solution to track when you switched heads.

A two-pack of brush heads costs 25 francs, and the toothpaste and mouthwash cost 10 francs each.

From https://www.galaxus.ch/en/page/dysons-electric-brush-sprays-...


This got a huge eyeroll from me. Very misleading product name.

I kept skimming to find what the "device" would be but it turns out there is no device. I still have to subscribe to their services and it's just cloud infrastructure with transparent hardware. Also, it sounds like _their_ orchestrator decides what to escalate to the cloud.

Was excited for a moment for a plug and play privacy focused hardware running an agent. Would have been interesting since Apple just announced new Mac Minis today.


This is neat. It's like a framework and language in one. Congrats on the launch! The tooling for it feels quite novel. I get the allure of having zero dependencies but... the reason why I have dependencies in the first place is because the ecosystem provides tons of functionality out of the box. Do you want the language/framework to provide all the functionality?

The landing page's main value prop is removing the dependency on JS. Thing is... I don't hate JS. Typescript has quite a lot of fans.

I feel like you should demonstrate performance metrics or app size or just some other value prop other than hating on Javascript.


Thank you for making this. Brings me back to Sid Meier's Pirates.


For some reason you are being downvoted but I wanted to echo your sentiment. As someone who tries to switch things up for every next task, the productivity of Claude Max is worth every penny.

And I actually read the output to fix what I don't like and ever since Opus 4.5, I've had to less and less. 4.6 had issues at the beginning but that's because you have to manually make sure you change the effort level.


How can you virtuously reminisce about the heydays of the open internet and then vaguely allude to gatekeeping the internet?


I'm sick and tired of seeing similar headlines and articles that reference the MIT report. It is incredible lazy journalism and borderline click bait.

The MIT report was created by project NANDA, a very pro-AI group. Read about them here: https://nanda.media.mit.edu/

The original Fortune article here: https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generat... cites specifically generative AI pilot programs.

From the article: "But for 95% of companies in the dataset, generative AI implementation is falling short. The core issue? Not the quality of the AI models, but the “learning gap” for both tools and organizations. While executives often blame regulation or model performance, MIT’s research points to flawed enterprise integration."

You could have a pile of cash and 95% of companies will fail to see zero return because they don't know how to pick up the money.


According to Genius, some fans believe the lyrics to reference when he toured in the Philippines and flew to Japan after. https://genius.com/14147648

The timing of the song being released in 2018 lines up.


Same, any existing study I've read follows abuse-level or Chronic usage. Would love to know affects of recreational usage.

I'd imagine such a study would be quite difficult because so many things could affect your results: sleep, diet, age, alcohol, covid, etc.

I know nothing about this but I feel like the technology exists to scan your brain before and after to see neuron damage. I just want to know if a single use causes permanent brain damage and to what extent.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: