this is probably one of the most interesting/inspiring games i've played in a very long time. i'm only 30 minutes or so into it, but i'm excited to see where it goes.
very nice service, i'm using it to build out an agent orchestration system and so far it's quite good. anything to share in terms of future plans/improvements to the platform?
I spent the last month or so migrating over a hundred models to v2 and it has been a pretty pleasant experience. Free performance gains and a lot more clear/readable models. On top of this interacting with complex nested root models is now much more organized and `.model_validate(data).model_dump()` always works whereas before I had to do a lot of strange json loading and dumping surrounding instantiation for certain models.
The changes are overall good and the library has matured into something that seems like it will be stable for a long time to come.
Especially considering the fact that there are discussions in the issues in these repos from the codeowners who "don't condone illegal activity" actively providing guidance on how to use the stolen data to login to victim's accounts on various services.
I signed up for this today and am quite enjoying it. There are a couple of nitpicks, but overall it seems like a very simple and elegant solution to this particular problem.
'I have suspected for years that the STEM fields posed the most dangerous threat possible to the unopposed dominance of politically correct sociological idiocy over the entirety of the university environment, basing their claim to validity on recognition of something approximating a universally accessible objective reality.
...
But, make no mistake about it, scientists, technologists, engineers and mathematicians: your famous immunity to political concerns will not protect you against what is coming fast over the next five or so years: wake up, pay attention, or perish, along with your legacy. Whatever you might offer the broader culture in terms of general value will be swept aside with little caution by those who regard the very axioms of your field as intolerable truly because of the difficulty in comprehending them and considered publicly as unacceptably exclusionary, unitary and unconcerned with sociological “realities.”'
