I like Caddy's integration with Cloudflare for handling SSL and when I originally saw the idea it was promoted as an easy way to have SSL for a homely but I don't use real domains for my internal apps and that is required with Cloudflare.
This is a lot of my similar setup in hardware. I just repurposed a PC I was using for windows that I barely used anyways. I would like to move that to a Framework Desktop mounted in my mini rack at some point though.
I ended up making my own dashboard app, not as detailed as Scrutiny because I just wanted a central place that linked to all my internal apps so I didn't have to remember them all and have a simple status check. I made my own in Go though because main ones I found were NodeJS and were huge resource hogs.
I’d be okay with it generating the posts and the reports of the financials and such but you need some human interaction in there.
Generate the posts with AI so it can free up your time to interact with people replying to the post.
Or write the bigger, longer, more content posts yourself with maybe some AI assistance in places here and there then use AI to create smaller posts from your larger posts. Still keeping with the human interaction with those that reply to the posts.
100% agree. Content generation is where agents shine — it's repetitive and time-consuming. But genuine engagement is where trust gets built, and that needs to be real.
My engagement scripts do auto-reply to comments on my own posts, but they're rate-limited and context-aware (max 2 rounds). For anything meaningful — client conversations, community discussions like this one — it's always me.
"Fair catch on both points.
The batch of replies: I had a list of expected questions and drafted answers beforehand. When I finally had time to respond, I posted them all at once. Not real-time typing — that's why the timing looks suspicious. Should've spaced them out.
On MRR: I dodged it. Honest answer — client project revenue is irregular (project-based, not subscription), so I don't track it as MRR. MindThread subscription revenue is early and small, I'm not comfortable putting a number on it publicly yet. What I can say: it covers my infra costs and Claude subscription with room left over. Not life-changing, but real
I figured California would have been against the age verification on the adult sites like Texas and some other states are doing but then they go and 1UP them and decide to require age verification on the whole OS
This is a weak read of the situation. I’d sure as fuck rather enter a date of birth or age profile on my computer than send my photo id to random websites to verify my age. One is clearly better from a privacy standpoint.
What’s doing the actual verification? Just entering date of birth as verification is pointless and just adds complexity. The original idea was stupid enough, no need to add more stupid to it.
> 1. You don't have to successfully explain the phenomena to demonstrate the claim is false.
Sometimes I feel like this is taken to the extreme for non-scientists that say that lack of evidence is in itself evidence. Depending on the circumstance and the tests, that could be true but its often a default mode.
> Sometimes I feel like this is taken to the extreme for non-scientists that say that lack of evidence is in itself evidence.
But of course, the lack of evidence is itself evidence, if you have a sufficiently large data sample and haven't seen the thing you're looking for. Keep pursuing the increasingly unlikely outcome, and you're just engaged in science-flavored religious catechism.
I see the fallacy routinely misapplied by all sides of most hot-button science-meets-politics issues. A great many scientists will regularly substitute their own pet theories for conclusions, and strenuously ignore the lack of supporting evidence, citing the old "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" saw. Then they turn around and mock "non-scientists" for doing the same thing. Neither side is right, of course, but dressing in a lab coat doesn't make it better.
Just to circle it back to the topic of science education, I'd love to see a science curriculum at the middle- and high-school level that equipped people to reason through this kind of thing by focusing on tearing apart pop research. A "science fair" is actually hard to do well just because most science fails, but a "scientific bullshit fair" would have almost infinite fertile ground from nutrition studies alone.
If they'd put a screenshot, that would then have been immediately clear to casual visitors.
My initial assumption was "this is gonna look like a typical OSS product, and not as polished as iOS or Android". A single screenshot would have dispelled that notion.
The one I don’t see that often used is color-scheme and light-dark. Both of those with css variables are so helpful with theming and having light and dark themes. Plus it works in all of the main browsers and the effect happens immediately, so you have your page up and switch your system from light to dark, you see it transition without having to refresh.
reply