Humans even have the creativity to come up with sketching.

Models don't have intelligence, even less so creative thinking.

That would complexity the architecture of a model, to solve a finite set of cases. That's an argument for specialised/fine tuned models though.

They are deterministic. Including in the way they fail.

The difference is that you can port f(x) -> y To be exactly that. To any target that exists and to come.

An LLM can't. Even within your primary target.

It's like explaining how a hammer isn't a screw driver. And someone comes to argue the fact that a hammer too, can break.

Also to point out that the U.S actively censors us too. It blocks Iranian government websites, and a whole list of sites that supports it.

I thought that was exactly how the spies got made. As Iranians figured they could just narrow the signal.

they adapt, they have memory and even purge these things when necessary ?

Animals, right? Because LLMs have none of those qualities.

I saw a trend of UX/UI designers coming with practice which I knew better were wrong. But they insisted. E.g hijack brosser native controls.

Will never know whether they passed along some manager/PM commandements or were just incompetent.

> But they insisted. E.g hijack brosser native controls.

[Rant-Example] The goshdarn ticketing-system hijacks alt-f, so that instead of opening the File menu of my browser, and instead toggles the favorite-status of whatever ticket I happen to be viewing.

A mistake was made early on even letting web apps see keystrokes like that. In a better world, modifier keys were used in a principled way from the start - only the window manager gets to see meta-anything, only the shell or GUI app gets to see control-anything, and web apps can work with alt-anything.

I did, and they probably don't care because they want everyone to use the electron app instead.

Press alt f to pay respect with the "respect my AI.thority" subscription

To be fair, the native browser controls have had too many quirks and features fox UX/UI consistency.

Corporate needs their Brand™ look precisely as specified in their expensive Style Guide. IBM wouldn't want the Google vibes of Android Material Design TextFields, I imagine.

Scratch beneath the visuals, and starker technical differences appear.

Safari on iOS (used to?) has a 350ms debounce delay on every tap / click, in case you want to do a multitouch gesture.

JavaScript (Frameworks) were the only way this arbitrary delay to user input could be reduced before 2015, when Apple finally released a native API for this.

https://webkit.org/blog/5610/more-responsive-tapping-on-ios/

> To be fair, the native browser controls have had too many quirks and features fox UX/UI consistency.

Well, too many to have a single website be consistent across browsers.

But as a user I'm using one specific browsers, and I expect all websites be consistent for that browser.

You can make a few phone calls. Maintenance is not avoidable until boston dynamics figure out how to clean the toilets at least.

If you make 500k and aren't spending 250k in token, you should get fired.

I can't even tell whether this comment is serious or not.

Person who profits indirectly from AI token spend advocates AI token spend.

Nobody would invent something like that as a joke...