Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fredmg's commentslogin

It will take the people on Wall St. about 2 days to stop trading 'shares' and start trading '1 millisecond options'. Firms like Goldman Sachs make money by skirting the laws and regulations. While the average investor would end up paying this tax.


You can deactivate your account when you sign off, then reactivate it whenever you want to do something with it. That way you are hopefully less vulnerable to their bugs and random privacy changes.


Pro tip: some settings reset to defaults when reactivating, so double check. A while back I found all of my notification settings reset to "email on everything" upon reactivating, and I think some privacy settings were different too.


This needs to be more widely publicized.


To protect against an unexpected market crash, traders have stop-loss orders that can be executed automatically if the market starts to tank.

  Trader 1 puts in a order to sell everything if the market goes down by 4% in 1 hour.  

  Trader 2 knows that and wants to get out of the market before trader 1 does in a crash, so he puts in a order to sell everything if the market goes down by 3.9% in 1 hour.

  Trader 3, Trader 4, etc. continue this process.

  Then you have a day like yesterday when the market goes down by 2 percent and there is a lot of uncertainty about Europe, causing more people to put in stop-loss orders.  The one automatic order triggers hundreds more.  

  Now they are going to rollback some of these trades because it was an "Trading Error".   When Investors on Wall St. have trades that make money it is because of their skill and they get bonuses.  But when their own stop-loss program sells for a 70% loss they get a do over.


> But when their own stop-loss program sells for a 70% loss they get a do over.

There has to be a mechanism to undo cascade mistakes because, if someone figures out a way (and that's rather easy) to induce mistakes and to profit from them, it will shortly become the prevalent form of trading. We want exchanges to foster investment on productive companies.


I was about to agree with the GPP, but you have a really good point. This would be the sort of loophole that would be exploited.


It's a market for intangibles; over the short term it's zero-sum. The only way to profit is to induce mistakes; to get someone on the other side of a trade that's profitable to you and damaging to them.

If algorithmic trading causes vulnerability to mistakes, they need to revise their algorithms or factor in the risk of this type of loss; that's the way free markets work. The externalities of a sudden crash suck, but other than as a one-time emergency measure, rolling back all the trades isn't a good solution. Wall Street firms should've learned something since 1987.


My guess is that the algorithms are already being adjusted. My fear is that a bunch of politicians who are as clueless as most everyone else are going to try use this as yet another opportunity to grab the spotlight. Expect congressional hearings.


This is the normal operation. The "undo" key is not supposed to be used unless something abnormal happens.


if someone figures out a way (and that's rather easy) to induce mistakes and to profit from them, it will shortly become the prevalent form of trading

That sounds contrary to what Goldman Sachs is saying why they shouldn't be sued. They are using the "big boys" defense.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/21/politics/washingto...


Nobody sane would trust them to write the rules on which the market operates.


Is it better than android as well?


yes, you would need "liks" tagged with subjects. I do want to hear about physics links from friend Bob, but also ban any link about politics/religion.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: