It’s meant to either act as a complement and/or substitute for humans. So it should be measured against those who get paid. Otherwise what is the firm paying for..?

Not true at all. Most projects I wouldn't hire a UX expert but I am happy to get feedback on it from AI

You’re wrong actually I suggest you read a book on industrial organisation and why monopoly is a more efficient market structure in relation to incentives for R&D.

Why do people comment on stuff they barely have an understanding of? Comical. People like you create noise.

Agreed it’s far more complex than that.

But people who have only wrote software their entire life wouldn’t know that would they?

It’s like the econ prof’s who theorise about the theory of the firm but have never done it themselves.

Is it just me or is this whole mania exposing those people who thought they were great ‘thinkers’? The takes I see are so utterly flawed it’s ironic - people refer to llm’s as hallucinating when the real halluncinations are from people cosplaying the role of management/investors when they have never done said role professionally in their life.