Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more KHRZ's commentslogin

With many people too lazy to read 2 walls of text, a lot of picks might be random.


Look up the Streisand effect.


Prisoners?


YouTube literally allows trading scams into their ad program, which they force onto users through their terms of service. This is far worse, as naive users may think that YouTube has vetted those ads.


In Minesweeper you also win when all non-mine tiles are revealed.


One good use case is unit tests, since they can be trivial while at the same time being cumbersome to make. I could give the LLM code for React components, and it would make the tests and setup all the mocks which is the most annoying part. Although making "all the tests" will typically involve asking the LLM again to think of more edge cases and be sure to cover everything.


Just take 10% of the Russian war economy to clean the garbage patch, then we would have double the money fro Ukraine weapon savings!


That's a lot of thinking they've done about LLMs, but how much did they actually try LLMs? I have long threads where ChatGPT refine solutions to coding problems. Their example of losing the thread after printing a tiny list of 10 philosophers seems really outdated. Also it seems LLMs utilize nested contexts as well, for example when it can break it' own rules while telling a story or speaking hypothetically.


For a paper submitted on July 11, 2024, and with several references to other 2024 publications, it is indeed strange that it gives ChatGPT output from April 2023 to demonstrate that “LLMs lose the thread of a conversation with inhuman ease, as outputs are generated in response to prompts rather than a consistent, shared dialogue” (Figure 1). I have had many consistent, shared dialogues with recent versions of ChatGPT and Claude without any loss of conversation thread even after many back-and-forths.


Most LLM critics (and singularity-is-near influencers) don't actually use the systems enough to have relevant opinions about them. The only really good sources of truth is the chatbot-arena from lmsys and the comment section of r/localllama (I'm quoting Karpathy), both are "wisdom of the crowd" and often the crowd on r/localllama is getting that wisdom by spending hours with one hand on the keyboard and another under their clothes.


From what I heard Crowdstrike just updated their DB file, which means the bug was alreadyq there, waiting for someone to trigger it with a "low risk" quick roll out.


So kind of like the xz exploit, carefully placed and laying in wait.

I only hope this was a good guy move by someone to knock a placed chess piece off the board.


"out of respect" for the angry woman rather than argue with her, you never had this problem with a wife/girlfriend?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: